400000 Canadians Rally Behind Telus in Fibre Battle Against Bell 33

400000 Canadians Rally Behind Telus in Fibre Battle Against Bell

Random Image

The Ongoing Battle for Fiber Internet Access in Canada

The discussion around fiber internet infrastructure sharing among Canadian telecom companies has become quite heated. Bell is pushing back against changes, while Telus is advocating for wider access, particularly as this could enhance its operations in Ontario and Quebec. Recently, Telus initiated a petition asking Canadians if they would prefer more choices when it comes to internet service providers. So far, the petition has gathered over 320,000 signatures in English and about 31,500 in French. In total, approximately 351,500 Canadians have shared their views on this matter. Additionally, Telus reports that another 50,000 people have shown support through text messages and emails.

Timing of the Petition Raises Questions

This raises an interesting question: why is Telus launching this petition now? The Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) recently reaffirmed its position on fiber-sharing rules. During a hearing on June 20th, the CRTC upheld its earlier decision allowing Telus to use Bell's infrastructure for its services-and vice versa. This ruling also permits smaller ISPs to provide services using both Bell and Telus networks. It seems that Telus is rallying support for something it already has permission to do.

On the flip side of things is Bell's approach. The company argues that CRTC policies hinder its ability to invest in new infrastructure projects effectively. According to Bell's marketing team, sharing networks restricts their potential returns on investments and has led them to pause their fiber service expansion plans altogether. Essentially, it appears that Bell wants changes made to the current network-sharing agreement since they stand to lose significantly from it.

Another aspect worth noting involves recent investment announcements from Telus; however, it's unclear whether these funds will be directed toward expanding fiber networks specifically in Eastern Canada or elsewhere. Moreover, other telecom companies are not taking the CRTC ruling lying down either-Cogeco and Eastlink are reportedly looking into appealing this decision as well.

CRTC Findings: A Mixed Bag

The CRTC concluded that any negative impacts from their ruling would likely be minimal at least for now. What stands out most is how Telus frames this issue; rather than focusing solely on affordability concerns among consumers or businesses seeking internet access options-Telus emphasizes choice among various service providers instead.

This focus becomes even more intriguing when we look at Telus' latest internet packages available in Ontario today.

Currently available from them is one standout package offering impressive download speeds of up to 1.5Gbps with upload speeds reaching up towards 940Mbps! While typically priced at $130 per month without any contract commitments attached-it can drop down as low as $79 monthly if bundled alongside existing mobile services provided by either Koodo or TELUS itself! Meanwhile,Bell offers a similar plan featuring identical speed capabilities but charges slightly higher rates ($110 over two years).

In contrast,Cogeco's top-tier plan provides only half those download speeds (1Gbps) along with much slower uploads (30Mbps)-yet some savvy users have managed deals bringing costs down below $50/month!

Uncertainty Surrounding Service Expansion Plans

On May 27th,TELUS announced intentions regarding “bringing TELUS PureFibre connectivity” across B.C., Alberta,Qubec,and Ontario-but what does “bringing” really mean? Does it imply utilizing existing infrastructures owned by competitors like Bell-or does TELUS intend building out entirely new systems?

From public perception alone,TELUS seems poised favorably compared against rivals such as bell.A recent tweet promoting criticism aimed directly at CRCT received significant engagement-but many comments turned critical towards bell itself suggesting complaints should give way toward actual investments into network construction instead! Some users even joked about preferring alternatives like Starlink over traditional offerings!

As developments unfold within these discussions surrounding fiber infrastructures-the competitive landscape remains dynamic with key players weighing options carefully while navigating interests across multiple fronts! Expect ongoing debates around accessibility,speed,and pricing strategies moving forward!

Please note that when you make a purchase through our links at GameHaunt, we might earn a small commission. This helps us keep bringing you the free journalism you love on our site! And don't worry; our editorial content remains totally unbiased.If you'd like show some support,you can do so here.